| Peer-Reviewed

Explore Moderated Mediation of Trust in Social Commerce on Links Between a User’s Perceived Past Negative Experiences and Social Commerce Engagement

Received: 7 April 2023    Accepted: 25 April 2023    Published: 10 May 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Due to the impact of the pandemic (COVID-19) crisis and the inflation threat, not only do companies change their production models, but also their operating modes. The purchase mode of consumers, moreover, are changed. These changes make social commerce (SC) more popular. However, there exist problems in SC. Therefore, not only is the purpose of this study to examine the role of a user’s perceived past negative experience (PPNE) in social commerce (SC) and the impact of trust in SC on a community user’s social commerce engagement (SCE), but is also to explore the moderating effects of perceived information credibility (PIC) on the relationship between a user’s PPNE and trust in SC. 349 valid samples were collected from the target population in Taiwan and analyzed data by AMOS 22 and SPSS PROCESS to examine a conceptual model and three hypotheses. Of the three hypotheses, all hypotheses were supported. The findings not only confirmed the psychological perception and effects of a user’s PPNE on trust in SC and the impact of trust in SC on user’s SCE, but also identified PIC as the moderating role in a virtual user’s PPNE – trust in SC chain. Besides the need for empirical confirmation of the hypotheses given, finally, there are several practical implications for social marketers and future research directions for scholars.

Published in International Journal of Science, Technology and Society (Volume 11, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijsts.20231103.15
Page(s) 122-129
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Perceived Information Credibility, Social Commerce Engagement, Perceived Past Negative Experiences

References
[1] Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[2] Algamash, F. A., Mashi, M. S., & Alam, M. N. (2022). Understanding the antecedents of use of e-commerce and consumers’ e-loyalty in Saudi Arabia Amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14 (22), 14894; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214894
[3] Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis, & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of Cross-cultural psychology: 389-444. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
[4] Busalim, A., Ghabban, D, Hussin, A. R. C. (2021). Customer engagement behaviour on social commerce platforms: An empirical study. Technology in Society, 64 (3). DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101437.
[5] Cheung, C. M. K., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: a literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54 (1): 461-470.
[6] Chih, W.-H., Chiu, T.-S., Lan, L.-C., & Fang, W.-C. (2017). Psychological contract violation Impact on perceived justice and behavioral intention among consumers. International Journal of Conflict Management, 28 (1), 103 – 121.
[7] Delgado-Ballester, E., Munuera-Aleman, J. L., & Jesús-Yagüe, M. (2003). Development and Validation of a Brand Trust Scale. International Journal of Market Research, 45 (1), 35-56.
[8] Dept. of household Registration. (2018). Statistics. Retrieved August 02, 2019 from https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/en/3910.
[9] Fang, Y.-H., & Chiu, C.-M. (2014). Exploring Online Double Deviation Effect from Psychological Contract Violation, Emotion, and Power Perspectives. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6 (1), 39-65.
[10] Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measure error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1): 39–50.
[11] Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27 (1): 51-90.
[12] Goles, T., Rao, S. V., Lee, S., & Warren, J. (2009). Trust violation in electronic commerce: customer concerns and reactions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49 (4), 1-9.
[13] Grégoire, Y., Laufer, D., & Tripp, T. M. (2010). A comprehensive model of customer direct and indirect revenge: understanding the effects of perceived greed and customer power. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38, 738-758.
[14] Gu, S., Slusarczyk, B., Hajizada, S., Kovalyova, I., & Sakhbieva, A. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on online consumer purchasing behavior. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16, 2263–2281. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16060125.
[15] Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
[16] Hajli, N. (2018). Ethical environment in the online communities by information credibility: a social media perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 149: 799-810.
[17] Hajli, N., Lin, X., Featherman, M., & Wang, Y. (2014). Social word of mouth: how trust develops in the market. International Journal of Market Research, 56 (5): 673-689.
[18] Hayes, A. F. (2013). Mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
[19] Herrando, C., Jimenex-Martinez, J., & Hoyos, M. J. M.-D. (2019). Social commerce users’ optimal experiences: stimuli, response and culture. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 20 (4), 199-218.
[20] Hill, J. A., Eckerd, S., Wilson, D., & Greer, B. (2009). The effect of unethical behavior on trust in a buyer-supplier relationship: the mediating role of psychological contract violation. Journal of Operations Management, 27 (4), 281-293.
[21] Hunt, S. D., & Lambe, C. J. (2000). Marketing’s contribution to business strategy: market orientation, relationship marketing and resource-advantage theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2 (1): 17-43.
[22] Hussian, S., Li, Y., & Li, W. (2021). Influence of platform characteristics on purchase intention in social commerce: mechanism of psychological contracts. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16 (1), 1-17.
[23] INSIDER INTELLIGENCE. (2022). Social commerce 2022: social media and ecommerce convergence trends bring growth opportunity for brands. https://www.insiderintelligence.com/insights/social-commerce-brand-trends-marketing-strategies/
[24] Koh, C., Ang, S., & Straub, D. (2004). IT outsourcing success: a psychological contract perspective. Information Systems Research, 15 (4): 356-373.
[25] Lai, I. K. W., & Liu, Y. (2020). The effects of content likeability, content credibility, and social media engagement on users’ acceptance of product placement in mobile social networks. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 15 (3), 1-19.
[26] Li, R., & Suh, A. (2015). Factors influencing information credibility on social media platforms: evidence from Facebook pages. Procedia Computer Science, 72: 314-328.
[27] Malhotra, N., Sahadev, S., & Purani, K. (2017). Psychological contract violation and customer intention to reuse online retailers: exploring mediating and moderating mechanisms. Journal of Business Research, 75, 17- 28.
[28] Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3): 709-734.
[29] Molinillo, S., Liébana-cabanillas, F., & Anaya-Sánchez, R. (2018). A social commerce intention model for traditional e-commerce sites, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 13 (2), 80-93.
[30] Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[31] Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2005). Psychological contract violation in on line marketplaces: antecedents, consequences, and moderating role. Information Systems Research, 16 (4), 372-399.
[32] Rahardja, U., Hongsuchon, T., Hariguna, T., & Ruangkanjanases, A. (2021). Understanding impact sustainable intention of s-commerce activities: the role of customer experiences, perceived value, and mediation of relationship quality. Sustainability, 13 (20), 1492; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011492
[33] Rehman, S. U., Bhatti, A., Mohamed, R., & Ayoup, H. (2019). The moderating role of trust and commitment between consumer purchase intention and online shopping behavior in the context of Pakistan. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9 (43). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-019-0166-2
[34] Shanmugam, M., Sun, S., Amidi, A., Khani, F., & Khani, F. (2016). The applications of social commerce constructs. International Journal of Information Management, 36 (3): 425-432.
[35] SlideShare. (2019). Digital 2019 Taiwan (January 2019) v01. Retrieved August 24, 2019 from https://www.slideshare.net/DataReportal/digital-2019-taiwan-january-2019-v01.
[36] Sussman, S. W., & Siegal, W. S. Informational influence in organizations: An integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Information Systems Research, 14, 1 (2003), 47–65.
[37] Wu, Y. L., & Li., E. Y. (2018). Marketing mix, customer value, and customer loyalty in social commerce: a stimulus-organism-response perspective. Internet Research, 28 (1), 74-104.
[38] Yang, Y.-C., & Lin, I.-H. (2021). Explore buffering effects of social media interactivity and perceived information credibility on a user’s perceived past negative experiences. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 14 (2), 55-67.
[39] Yin, X., Wang, H., Xia, Q., & Gu, Q. (2019). How social interaction affects purchase intention in social commerce: a cultural perspective. Sustainability, 11, 2423. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/242
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ying-Chieh Yang. (2023). Explore Moderated Mediation of Trust in Social Commerce on Links Between a User’s Perceived Past Negative Experiences and Social Commerce Engagement. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 11(3), 122-129. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20231103.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ying-Chieh Yang. Explore Moderated Mediation of Trust in Social Commerce on Links Between a User’s Perceived Past Negative Experiences and Social Commerce Engagement. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2023, 11(3), 122-129. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20231103.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ying-Chieh Yang. Explore Moderated Mediation of Trust in Social Commerce on Links Between a User’s Perceived Past Negative Experiences and Social Commerce Engagement. Int J Sci Technol Soc. 2023;11(3):122-129. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20231103.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijsts.20231103.15,
      author = {Ying-Chieh Yang},
      title = {Explore Moderated Mediation of Trust in Social Commerce on Links Between a User’s Perceived Past Negative Experiences and Social Commerce Engagement},
      journal = {International Journal of Science, Technology and Society},
      volume = {11},
      number = {3},
      pages = {122-129},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijsts.20231103.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20231103.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsts.20231103.15},
      abstract = {Due to the impact of the pandemic (COVID-19) crisis and the inflation threat, not only do companies change their production models, but also their operating modes. The purchase mode of consumers, moreover, are changed. These changes make social commerce (SC) more popular. However, there exist problems in SC. Therefore, not only is the purpose of this study to examine the role of a user’s perceived past negative experience (PPNE) in social commerce (SC) and the impact of trust in SC on a community user’s social commerce engagement (SCE), but is also to explore the moderating effects of perceived information credibility (PIC) on the relationship between a user’s PPNE and trust in SC. 349 valid samples were collected from the target population in Taiwan and analyzed data by AMOS 22 and SPSS PROCESS to examine a conceptual model and three hypotheses. Of the three hypotheses, all hypotheses were supported. The findings not only confirmed the psychological perception and effects of a user’s PPNE on trust in SC and the impact of trust in SC on user’s SCE, but also identified PIC as the moderating role in a virtual user’s PPNE – trust in SC chain. Besides the need for empirical confirmation of the hypotheses given, finally, there are several practical implications for social marketers and future research directions for scholars.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Explore Moderated Mediation of Trust in Social Commerce on Links Between a User’s Perceived Past Negative Experiences and Social Commerce Engagement
    AU  - Ying-Chieh Yang
    Y1  - 2023/05/10
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20231103.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsts.20231103.15
    T2  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
    JF  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
    JO  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
    SP  - 122
    EP  - 129
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-7420
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20231103.15
    AB  - Due to the impact of the pandemic (COVID-19) crisis and the inflation threat, not only do companies change their production models, but also their operating modes. The purchase mode of consumers, moreover, are changed. These changes make social commerce (SC) more popular. However, there exist problems in SC. Therefore, not only is the purpose of this study to examine the role of a user’s perceived past negative experience (PPNE) in social commerce (SC) and the impact of trust in SC on a community user’s social commerce engagement (SCE), but is also to explore the moderating effects of perceived information credibility (PIC) on the relationship between a user’s PPNE and trust in SC. 349 valid samples were collected from the target population in Taiwan and analyzed data by AMOS 22 and SPSS PROCESS to examine a conceptual model and three hypotheses. Of the three hypotheses, all hypotheses were supported. The findings not only confirmed the psychological perception and effects of a user’s PPNE on trust in SC and the impact of trust in SC on user’s SCE, but also identified PIC as the moderating role in a virtual user’s PPNE – trust in SC chain. Besides the need for empirical confirmation of the hypotheses given, finally, there are several practical implications for social marketers and future research directions for scholars.
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Economics and Management College, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, China

  • Sections