| Peer-Reviewed

Effect of Planting Density and Fertilizer Rate on Some Physiological Parameters of Arabica Coffee Seedlings

Received: 31 August 2021    Accepted: 12 October 2021    Published: 28 October 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Planting high density can reduce photosynthetic active radiation due to mutual shading or low light interception. The nature of the canopy and utilization of solar radiation influence the performances of coffee genotype. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of planting density and fertilizer rate on physiological parameters of Arabica coffee seedlings under nursery conditions. It was conducted at the Jimma Agricultural Research Center in southwest Ethiopia in 2018 season. A factorial experimentation in a completely randomized design with three replications was used for the study. The treatments consisted of combinations of two Arabica coffee cultivars (compact-74110 and open-75227), four population densities per polythene tube (one, two, three and four) and three compound NPK fertilizer (22:6:12 + Te) rates (control, 5g and 10g). The most common plant physiological parameters including NAR, AGR, RGR and CGR were estimated and analyzed using standard procedures. The results showed that interaction between cultivar, population density and fertilizer significantly (P ≤0.05) influenced NAR and CGR, and highly significantly (P ≤0.01) influenced AGR and RGR. The highest values of NAR, AGR, RGR and CGR were recorded from the lowest population density (PD1) and increased in the order of PD1 > PD2 > PD3 > PD4 for each parameter. Application of 5g of NPK significantly enhanced NAR, AGR, RGR and CGR as compared with other fertilizer rates, while these parameters were observed to decrease for 10g of NPK perhaps due to toxicity problem. In general, high planting density decrease physiological parameters of the coffee plant, so more attention like intensive coffee tree management practices as well as optimization of population density should be done under field conditions to increase physiological parameters of the coffee plant.

Published in International Journal of Science, Technology and Society (Volume 9, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijsts.20210905.13
Page(s) 222-227
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Coffee Nursery, Physiological Parameters, Compound Fertilizer, Population Density

References
[1] Morais, H., Marur, C. J., Caramori, P. H., Ribeiro, M. A. and Gomes, J. C., 2003. Physiological characteristics and growth of coffee plants grown under shade of pigeonpea and unshaded. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 38 (10): 1131-1137.
[2] Amanullah, Asif, M., Nawab, K., Shah, Z., Hassan, M., Khan, A. Z., Khalil, S. K., Hussain, Z., Tariq, M. and Rahman, H. 2010. Impact of planting density and P-fertilizer source on the growth analysis of maize. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42 (4): 2349-2357.
[3] Lee, D. W., 1985. Duplicating foliage shade for research on plant development. Horticultural Science (USA). Limitation to photosynthesis in coffee leaves from different canopy positions. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 46: 884-890.
[4] Taye Kufa and Burkhardt J. 2015. Physiological growth response in seedlings of Arabica coffee genotypes under contrasting nursery microenvironments. Plant, 3 (5): 47-56.
[5] Araujo, W. L., Dias, P. C., Moraes, G. A. B. K., Celin, E. F., Cunha, R. L. and Barros, R. S. 2008. Limitation to photosynthesis in coffee leaves from different canopy positions. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 46: 884-890.
[6] Taye Kufa. 1996. Cova planting favors coffee production at Melko. Institute of Agricultural Research Newsletter, Agricultural Research, 12: 5-6.
[7] Paulo, E. M. and Furlani, E. Jr. 2010. Yield performance and leaf nutrient of coffee cultivars under different plant density. Science of Agriculture, 67 (6): 720-726.
[8] DaMatta, F. 2004. Eco-physiological constraints on the production of shaded and unshaded coffee: a review. Field Crops Research, 86: 99-114.
[9] Avelino, J., Barboza, B., Araya, J., Fonseca, C. and Davrieux, F. 2005. Effect of slope exposure, altitude and yield on coffee quality in two altitude terroirs of Costa Rica, and Santa Maria de Dota. Journal Science Food Agriculture, 85: 1869-1876.
[10] Ibiremo, O. S. and Akanbi, O. S. O. 2016. Soil properties and nutrient uptake of coffee seedlings as influenced by NPK fertilizer formulations in Ibadan, Southwest Nigeria. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 12 (3): 1-8.
[11] Taye Kufa, Mesfin Abebe and Paulos Dubale. 1999. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and organic fertilizer on growth and development of coffee seedlings. In: Proceedings of African Crop Science Conference. Volume 4, Kampala, Uganda. pp. 213-223.
[12] Fuad Abafita, 2010. Studies on the diversity of insect pests in wild and cultivated coffee plantations in and around Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia. pp. 20-21.
[13] Tesfaye Shimber, Alemseged Yilma, Taye Kufa, Endale Taye and Anteneh Netsere. 2005. “Coffee seedlings management and production.” Amharic version, Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 17pp.
[14] Antonio Jackson de Jesus Souza, Rubens José Guimarães, Alberto Colombo, José Antonio do Vale Sant’Ana and Dalyse Toledo Castanheira. 2016. Quantitative analysis of growth in coffee plants cultivated with a water-retaining polymer in an irrigated system, Revista Ciência Agronômica, 47 (1): 162-171.
[15] Radford, P. J. 1967. Growth analysis formula, their uses and abuses. Crop Science, 7: 171-175.
[16] John, P. A. L., Asia Khamzina and Martin Worbes. 2006. The analyses of physiological and morphological attributes of 10 tree species for early determination of their suitability to afforest degraded landscapes in the Aral Sea Basin of Uzbekistan, Forest Ecology and Management, 221 (1-3): 249-259.
[17] SAS (Statistical Analysis System). 2011. SAS/STAT 9.3 user’s guide. Cray, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
[18] Naser Al-Suhaibani, Salah El-Hendawy and Urs Schmidhalter. 2013. Influence of Varied Plant Density on Growth, Yield and Economic Return of Drip Irrigated Fababean (Vicia faba L.). Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 18 (2): 185-197.
[19] Arvind Kumar and Purohit, S. S. 2014. Plant Physiology: Fundamentals and Application. Second Enlarged Edition. India. 353 p.
[20] Poorter, H. 1989. Inter specific variation in relative growth rate: on ecological causes and physiological consequences. In: Lambers H. (Ed.), Causes and Consequences of Variation in Growth Rate and Productivity in Higher Plants. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, the Netherlands, pp: 45-68.
[21] Behnam Ahmadi, Amir Hosein, Shirani Rad and Ali khorgami. 2014. The effect of plant population densities and cultivars on forage yield, qualitative traits and growth indices in canola forage (Brassica napus L.). European Journal of Zoological Research, 3 (1): 62-70.
[22] DaMatta, F. M., 2018. Coffee tree growth and environmental acclimation. In Achieving sustainable cultivation of coffee. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, pp: 39-66.
[23] Konard, M., Kosegarten, H., Appel, T. and Kirkby, E. A. 2001. Principles of Plant Nutrition. Fifth Edition. 299 p.
[24] Amanullah, Rahman, H., Shah, Z. and Shah, P. 2008. Plant density and nitrogen effects on growth dynamics and light interception of maize. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 54: 401-411.
[25] Ibiremo, O. S., Akanbi, O. S. O., Oloyede, A. A., Adebowale, L. A. and Adeyemi, E. A. 2013. Evaluation of NPK fertilizer formulations on the growth and dry matter yield of coffee seedlings. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, 23 (1): 22-26.
[26] Hendrik Poorter. 2016. Inter specific variation in relative growth rate: on ecological causes and physiological consequences. Cause and consequences of variation in growth rate and productivity of higher plants. Department of Plant Ecology, University of Utrecht, Lange Nieuwstraat 106, 3512 PN Utrecht, The Netherlands, 24: 45-68.
[27] Poorter, H. 2002. Plant Growth and Carbon Economy. Encyclopaedia of Life Sciences, pp. 1-6.
[28] Pandey, M. and Singh, T. 2015. Effect of intercropping systems and different levels of nutrients on dry matter accumulation and physiological growth parameters of bed planted wheat (Triricum aestivum L.). Indian Journal Science, 8 (11): 1-6.
[29] Jeffrey, T. E., Larry, C. P. and Earl, D. V. 2005. Light interception and yield potential of short season maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids in the mid south. Agronomy Journal, 97 (1): 225-234.
[30] Habibzadeh, Y., Mamghani, R., Kashani, A. and Mesgharbashi, M. 2006. Effect of density on yield and some vegetative and reproductive characters of three mungbean genotypes in Ahwaz area. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 37: 227-335.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Wubishet Tamirat, Amsalu Gobena, Taye Kufa. (2021). Effect of Planting Density and Fertilizer Rate on Some Physiological Parameters of Arabica Coffee Seedlings. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 9(5), 222-227. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20210905.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Wubishet Tamirat; Amsalu Gobena; Taye Kufa. Effect of Planting Density and Fertilizer Rate on Some Physiological Parameters of Arabica Coffee Seedlings. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2021, 9(5), 222-227. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20210905.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Wubishet Tamirat, Amsalu Gobena, Taye Kufa. Effect of Planting Density and Fertilizer Rate on Some Physiological Parameters of Arabica Coffee Seedlings. Int J Sci Technol Soc. 2021;9(5):222-227. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20210905.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijsts.20210905.13,
      author = {Wubishet Tamirat and Amsalu Gobena and Taye Kufa},
      title = {Effect of Planting Density and Fertilizer Rate on Some Physiological Parameters of Arabica Coffee Seedlings},
      journal = {International Journal of Science, Technology and Society},
      volume = {9},
      number = {5},
      pages = {222-227},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijsts.20210905.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20210905.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsts.20210905.13},
      abstract = {Planting high density can reduce photosynthetic active radiation due to mutual shading or low light interception. The nature of the canopy and utilization of solar radiation influence the performances of coffee genotype. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of planting density and fertilizer rate on physiological parameters of Arabica coffee seedlings under nursery conditions. It was conducted at the Jimma Agricultural Research Center in southwest Ethiopia in 2018 season. A factorial experimentation in a completely randomized design with three replications was used for the study. The treatments consisted of combinations of two Arabica coffee cultivars (compact-74110 and open-75227), four population densities per polythene tube (one, two, three and four) and three compound NPK fertilizer (22:6:12 + Te) rates (control, 5g and 10g). The most common plant physiological parameters including NAR, AGR, RGR and CGR were estimated and analyzed using standard procedures. The results showed that interaction between cultivar, population density and fertilizer significantly (P ≤0.05) influenced NAR and CGR, and highly significantly (P ≤0.01) influenced AGR and RGR. The highest values of NAR, AGR, RGR and CGR were recorded from the lowest population density (PD1) and increased in the order of PD1 > PD2 > PD3 > PD4 for each parameter. Application of 5g of NPK significantly enhanced NAR, AGR, RGR and CGR as compared with other fertilizer rates, while these parameters were observed to decrease for 10g of NPK perhaps due to toxicity problem. In general, high planting density decrease physiological parameters of the coffee plant, so more attention like intensive coffee tree management practices as well as optimization of population density should be done under field conditions to increase physiological parameters of the coffee plant.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effect of Planting Density and Fertilizer Rate on Some Physiological Parameters of Arabica Coffee Seedlings
    AU  - Wubishet Tamirat
    AU  - Amsalu Gobena
    AU  - Taye Kufa
    Y1  - 2021/10/28
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20210905.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsts.20210905.13
    T2  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
    JF  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
    JO  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
    SP  - 222
    EP  - 227
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-7420
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20210905.13
    AB  - Planting high density can reduce photosynthetic active radiation due to mutual shading or low light interception. The nature of the canopy and utilization of solar radiation influence the performances of coffee genotype. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of planting density and fertilizer rate on physiological parameters of Arabica coffee seedlings under nursery conditions. It was conducted at the Jimma Agricultural Research Center in southwest Ethiopia in 2018 season. A factorial experimentation in a completely randomized design with three replications was used for the study. The treatments consisted of combinations of two Arabica coffee cultivars (compact-74110 and open-75227), four population densities per polythene tube (one, two, three and four) and three compound NPK fertilizer (22:6:12 + Te) rates (control, 5g and 10g). The most common plant physiological parameters including NAR, AGR, RGR and CGR were estimated and analyzed using standard procedures. The results showed that interaction between cultivar, population density and fertilizer significantly (P ≤0.05) influenced NAR and CGR, and highly significantly (P ≤0.01) influenced AGR and RGR. The highest values of NAR, AGR, RGR and CGR were recorded from the lowest population density (PD1) and increased in the order of PD1 > PD2 > PD3 > PD4 for each parameter. Application of 5g of NPK significantly enhanced NAR, AGR, RGR and CGR as compared with other fertilizer rates, while these parameters were observed to decrease for 10g of NPK perhaps due to toxicity problem. In general, high planting density decrease physiological parameters of the coffee plant, so more attention like intensive coffee tree management practices as well as optimization of population density should be done under field conditions to increase physiological parameters of the coffee plant.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Jimma, Ethiopia

  • College of Agriculture, School of Plant and Horticultural Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia

  • International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Burundi-Station, Bujumbura, Burundi

  • Sections