The research was influenced by the growing demand for psychosocial support interventions owing to disintegrating family and community support systems and ineffective management of psychosocial support resulting from the effects of COVID-19 pandemic. The study analysed risk management in the Eswatini psychosocial support program for orphan and vulnerable children from a project management perspective. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed in one region where psychosocial support problems were most prevalent. The survey attracted 109 responses from caregivers, who are the face of psychosocial support service in the communities. Twelve risk indicators were analysed representing manpower, material, machine, and methods risks. Research results show that all the twelve risk indicators had moderate to very high probability of happening and the same risks could pose high to critical impact if they occurred. Respondents felt that COVID-19 caused significant change to four of the assessed risks, low change to seven risks and no change to one. This implies that the high probability and high impact of the assessed risks impeded the provision of psychosocial support in the country. The proposed way forward includes the implementation of project risk management strategies. This could include implementing the proposed psychosocial support risk prioritisation model and gaining new knowledge and information through research. The use of a model recognises the dynamic nature of project risk management. Therefore, the authorities need to continuously review and monitor psychosocial management processes and accommodate emerging issues such as COVID-19. Management must aim to eliminate complacency in psychosocial support delivery processes.
| Published in | International Journal of Science, Technology and Society (Volume 10, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsts.20221005.11 |
| Page(s) | 166-175 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Caregivers, Orphan and Vulnerable Children, Neighbourhood Care Points, Psychosocial Support, Risk Assessment, Risk Prioritisation Model
| [1] | International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies: Reference Centre for Psychosocial Support (2009). Psychosocial Support Preventions: A Handbook. 27 DK-2100 Copenhagen: Blegdamsve. |
| [2] | INEE-The Inter Agency Network for Education in Emergencies (2010). Guidance Note: Psychosocial Support: Facilitating Psychosocial Support Wellbeing and Social and Emotional Learning, New York NY.USA. |
| [3] | Project Management Institute (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOKÒ)-Fifteenth Edition. Newton Square, PA. |
| [4] | Young, T. L. (2013). Successful Project Management: Creating Success, 4th Edition, London: Kogan Page Limited. |
| [5] | Mark, W., Cohen, P. E. and Glen, R. P. (2004). Project Risk Identification and Management AACE International Transaction INT. 01.1-5. S. |
| [6] | Hillson, D. (2014). Managing Overall Project Risk. Paper Presented at PMIÒ Global Congress-EMEA, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Newton Square, PA. Project Management Institute. |
| [7] | Kapuscinska, K. and Matejun, M. (2014). Risk Management in Public Sector Organisations: A Case Study. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 3 (3) 129-143. |
| [8] | Dzirikure, M., Gaillard, C. and Murove, T. (2011). Regional Conceptual Framework for Psychosocial Support for Orphans and Other Vulnerable Children and Youth. Save the Children U.K.sadc.int/files/9913/5293/3501/Regional_Conceptual_Framework_psychosocial_support.pdf. Last visited on 6 May 2021. |
| [9] | United Nation Children`s Fund (2021). Draft Country Programme Document (CPD) for Eswatini 9-12 February. |
| [10] | Mwoma, T. and Pillay, J. (2015). Psychosocial Support for Orphans and Vulnerable Children in Public Schools: Challenges and Intervention Strategies. South African Journal of Education, 35 (3) August 2015 DOI: 10: 15700/sage. |
| [11] | Penner, N., Sharp, C., Marais, L., Boivin, M. J., Shohet, C. and Givon, D. (2020). Community Based Caregiver and Family Intervention to Support the Mental Health of Orphans and Vulnerable Children: Review and Future Directions: July 2020, New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. DOI: 1002/cad.20352. |
| [12] | Stevenson, W. J. (2012). Operations Management: Theory and Practice. 11th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. |
| [13] | Heizer, J., Render, B. and Rajashekhar, J. (2013). Operations Management. 9th Edition, Noida 201309, UP India: Dorling Kindersley. |
| [14] | Oakland, J. S. (2014). Total Quality Management and Operational Excellence: Text with Cases: 4th Edition. New York: Routledge. |
| [15] | Evans, J. R. and Lindsey, W. M. (2017). Managing for Quality and Performance Excellence. 10th Edition. USA, Boston: Cengage Learning. |
| [16] | Brown, S., Bessant, J. and Lamming, R. (2013). Strategic Operations Management, 3rd Edition. London and New York: Routledge. |
| [17] | International Labour Organisation (2016). Psychosocial Risks and Use of New Technologies in Government Administrations. TUNED (Trade Union`s National and European Delegation). Geneva: Labour Research Department. |
| [18] | Langeham, M., Leka, S. and Jain, A.(2013). Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making. Safety and Work, 4 (2013), pp. 87-94. |
| [19] | Dobson, I. and Hietala, J. (2011). Risk Management. The Open Group Guide, Hetrojenbosch, the Netherlands: Van Haren Publishing. |
| [20] | Kotler, P. and Keller, K. (2012). Marketing Management, 14th Edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. |
| [21] | Checinski, M., Dillon, R., Hieronimus, S. and Klier, J. (2019). Online. McKinsey.com/industries/public-and-social-sector/-insights/putting-people-at-the-heartof-public-sector-transformations. Last visited 14 May 2021. |
| [22] | Lesotho Ministry of Social Development (2012). National Strategic Plan on Vulnerable Children April 2012 March 2017-extwprlegsl.fao.org/docs/pdf/les17792.pdf. |
| [23] | Tworek, P. (2016). Risk Management in the Public Sector Organisations-Principles, Methods and Tools, 8th International Scientific Conference on Managing and Modelling of Financial Risks, pp. 1022-1029. 5th - 6th September 2016. Ostrava. |
| [24] | Jusoh, Z. M. and Kasim, N. (2017). A review on Implication of Material Management to Project Management. MATEC Web of Conferences 87, 01012 (2017) ENCON 2016. DOI: 1051/matecconf1201787011012. |
| [25] | Tallaki, M. and Bracci, E. (2021). Risk Perception, Accounting and Resilience in Public Sector Organisations: A Case Study Analysis, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14 (4). Online. https://doi.org/10.3390/rfm14010004.Last visited 14 May 2021. |
| [26] | Tiatusin. K. and Rotchanakitumnuai, S. I. T. (2021). Risk Management for E-Government Implementation Success, Thammasa Business School. Online. Jba.tbs.tu.ac. th/files/Jba135/Article/JBA135 Krongsiri.pdf. Visited 16 April 2021. |
| [27] | Fulton, L. (2016). Psychosocial Risks and Use of New Technologies in Government Administrations. TUNED (Trade Union`s National and European Delegation) Project Seminal: The Impact of the use of new Technologies, 22 September 2016. Vilnius. https://www.fonctionpublique.gouv.fr/files/files/europe_et_international/4L_Fulton_Vilnius_presentation_Psychosocial_risks_in_central_government.pdf.Last Visited 2 June 2021. |
| [28] | Australian Government, Department of Finance (2016). Implementing the Commonwealth Risk Management Policy. Online: finance.gov.an./sites/default/files/2019-11 Implementing-the-rm-policy.pdf. Last visited 14 May 2021. |
| [29] | Chernet, T. (2001). Overview of Services for Orphans and Vulnerable Children in Ethiopia. Report Version of Presentation at National Workshop, Kigali, Rwanda, March 27-29, 2001, April 2. |
| [30] | Bunkers, K. and Ventimiglia, T. (2017). Good Practices in Case Management: How Your OVC Programme can be Ready for a Site Improvement Monitoring System (SIMS) Assessment-Guidance for U.S. President`s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) pp. 1-16. ovcsupport.org/wp-contentuploads/2017/09/1705388-SIMS-care-management_FINAL_ONLINE_pdf.Last visited on 6 May 2021. |
| [31] | Assen, M. V., Vandenberg, G. and Pietersma, P. (2009). Key Management Models: The 60 Models Every Manager Needs to Know, 2nd Edition, Finance Times. Beren Schot, BV, The Netherlands: Prentice-Hall. |
| [32] | Razenkhani, P. (2012). Current state of Existing Project Risk Modelling and Analysis Methods with Focus on Fuzzy Risk Assessment-Literature Review. DOI: 103221/IGFE.20.02 pp. 17-21. |
| [33] | Kaplan, R. S. and Mikes, A. (2012). Managing Risks: A New Framework. Harvard Business Review (June 2012). hbr.org/2012/06/managing–risks-a-new-framework. Last visited 12 May 2021. |
| [34] | Grosfeld, A., Ronen, B. and Kozlovsky, N. (2007). The Pareto Principle: when does it apply International Journal of Production Research, 45 (10), pp. 2317-2325. |
| [35] | Kruger, D. Ramphal, R. and Maritz, M. (2013). Operations Management. 3rd Edition, Cape Town: Oxford University Press. |
APA Style
Happyson Bimha. (2022). Psychosocial Support Risk Prioritisation Model [PSSRPM] for Orphaned and Vulnerable Children: A Case of the Kingdom of Eswatini. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 10(5), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20221005.11
ACS Style
Happyson Bimha. Psychosocial Support Risk Prioritisation Model [PSSRPM] for Orphaned and Vulnerable Children: A Case of the Kingdom of Eswatini. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2022, 10(5), 166-175. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20221005.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijsts.20221005.11,
author = {Happyson Bimha},
title = {Psychosocial Support Risk Prioritisation Model [PSSRPM] for Orphaned and Vulnerable Children: A Case of the Kingdom of Eswatini},
journal = {International Journal of Science, Technology and Society},
volume = {10},
number = {5},
pages = {166-175},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijsts.20221005.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20221005.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsts.20221005.11},
abstract = {The research was influenced by the growing demand for psychosocial support interventions owing to disintegrating family and community support systems and ineffective management of psychosocial support resulting from the effects of COVID-19 pandemic. The study analysed risk management in the Eswatini psychosocial support program for orphan and vulnerable children from a project management perspective. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed in one region where psychosocial support problems were most prevalent. The survey attracted 109 responses from caregivers, who are the face of psychosocial support service in the communities. Twelve risk indicators were analysed representing manpower, material, machine, and methods risks. Research results show that all the twelve risk indicators had moderate to very high probability of happening and the same risks could pose high to critical impact if they occurred. Respondents felt that COVID-19 caused significant change to four of the assessed risks, low change to seven risks and no change to one. This implies that the high probability and high impact of the assessed risks impeded the provision of psychosocial support in the country. The proposed way forward includes the implementation of project risk management strategies. This could include implementing the proposed psychosocial support risk prioritisation model and gaining new knowledge and information through research. The use of a model recognises the dynamic nature of project risk management. Therefore, the authorities need to continuously review and monitor psychosocial management processes and accommodate emerging issues such as COVID-19. Management must aim to eliminate complacency in psychosocial support delivery processes.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Psychosocial Support Risk Prioritisation Model [PSSRPM] for Orphaned and Vulnerable Children: A Case of the Kingdom of Eswatini AU - Happyson Bimha Y1 - 2022/09/28 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20221005.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsts.20221005.11 T2 - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JF - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JO - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society SP - 166 EP - 175 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7420 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20221005.11 AB - The research was influenced by the growing demand for psychosocial support interventions owing to disintegrating family and community support systems and ineffective management of psychosocial support resulting from the effects of COVID-19 pandemic. The study analysed risk management in the Eswatini psychosocial support program for orphan and vulnerable children from a project management perspective. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed in one region where psychosocial support problems were most prevalent. The survey attracted 109 responses from caregivers, who are the face of psychosocial support service in the communities. Twelve risk indicators were analysed representing manpower, material, machine, and methods risks. Research results show that all the twelve risk indicators had moderate to very high probability of happening and the same risks could pose high to critical impact if they occurred. Respondents felt that COVID-19 caused significant change to four of the assessed risks, low change to seven risks and no change to one. This implies that the high probability and high impact of the assessed risks impeded the provision of psychosocial support in the country. The proposed way forward includes the implementation of project risk management strategies. This could include implementing the proposed psychosocial support risk prioritisation model and gaining new knowledge and information through research. The use of a model recognises the dynamic nature of project risk management. Therefore, the authorities need to continuously review and monitor psychosocial management processes and accommodate emerging issues such as COVID-19. Management must aim to eliminate complacency in psychosocial support delivery processes. VL - 10 IS - 5 ER -
Email: